Видео

It's sad to see the p5 guy growing OLD. I am following your content from when I was in high school.

Why there is depth in minimax props whats is the purpose of that

When the square was imperfect on the whiteboard i almost gone crazy.

WOW, this is such a great video, love it.

thanks for the video. Patenting algorithms is such a scummy thing, its like patenting logic and telling people they cant think in this way.

I remember making similar games but on the TRS-80 model 1. When I upgraded to the model 3, I started advertising the game in software publications similar to yellow pages. I didn't sell a single copy. Haha.

i like your face after seeing your face i feel more relaxed

You have a gift? First youtube personality to get me to want to learn to program! Thank you for your time!

I loved these Apple II coding challenges! I really hope you revisit this series at some point. I have programmed a lot on a somewhat modernised version of BASIC thanks to SmileBASIC for the Nintendo Switch and Nintendo 3DS, so I have a fondness for this old-fashioned algorithmic programming. Maybe at some point you could take a look at this great piece of software by SmileBoom! (I reccomend the switch version so you can use a USB keyboard) Aside from the text-based and graphics mode stuff, it has capacity to load and save backgrounds, display tilemaps, move sprites, and play sounds and music, with a built-in library of example graphics, music and sound. This makes it into a very simple game engine of sorts, but it has a real vintage feel since you do all by code, like a commodore and an NES put together. You can even use the hardware's unique features, like the 3DS dual-screens and touch screen, and I think the Switch version is compatible with the LABO cardboard controllers. It can be compared to Processing in how it makes programming fun, visual and creative, but running on a BASIC-style paradigm. You can really tell it's a labour of love. A shame that you can't compile the programs for PC. At one point I even programmed a game engine to wrap the per-sprite code functionality, being able to define and instantiate sprite classes, and run framerate independent code calculating Delta Time, in addition to some utility functions like linear interpolation. I called it the Reptile Engine for some reason. I never used it to make any games, because I couldn't deal with the mess of having so much code on a single program, and I hadn't figured out the self-modifying code functionality or any other way to separate the engine code from the game script. Still, a proud achievement, coded by touchscreen and stylus on a 3DS with no real OOP functionality.

You had me until you pronounced gif with a hard G 😂

I don't program in Javascript. I'm trying to relearn object Pascal and I thought your starfield simulation would be a good starting off point. I've got as far as creating a star type, creating an array of stars, giving them starting positions, and displaying them on the screen. Now I'm trying to animate them but Pascal doesn't have a map function. I tried to find out using Google but so far I've only found a map function in Javascript that works on arrays. What exactly is this line of code doing : sx = map(x / z, 0, 1, 0, width) ? TIA.

Came for the Khan reference, stayed for the coding! Keep coding, everyone!🎉

9:45 240622

This looks amazing! I just wish the video was in English. :D j/k ;) If there is a way to make this in C# I need to figure out how :D

I've been coding since forever, I'm not even sure why I started watching this, but I'm so happy I did! What a great video, you're an engaging and entertaining teacher, and I think (it's hard to say) you present it in a way that's accessible for people of all levels. Awesome work. 💗

It is people like yourself that made me love programming. You, Sir, are a force for good 👍

I give this a like because you used interrobang in the captions.

Wish I saw this videos sooner! Finally I'm understanding

25:42 the people laughing in background feels like he is doing a comedy skit.

you are one of the best teacher and your intusiasem is a lot

1. We're going to go quickly. 2. We're not going to rush. 3. We're going to meditate.

The great Shiffman!!!!

i lub u

This is possibly my favorite RUclips video. "This probably won't work out". Now there are 1.69 million subscribers. Shiffman is the GOAT!!

I really like the eighties shirt, but TUCK IT. People tucked shirts in the eighties! We're not on Hawaii!

Whilst watching the coding train, thought he was coding a game. His maths was sound, the topic profound. He taught me something again.

NOITA SHOUTOUT!! THAT GAME IS INSANE!

Please, can someone show me how to export the final stippling to a svg file. I'm not a programmer! Tks!

Professor, your class is incredible!!!!

Thank you very much teacher, that was wonderful!!!!!!

maybe contains function should be called is_within?

This is the third time I watch this video

Butterfly wing might cause a storm, at least in theory, but that's not the sort of thing that causes a volcano eruption.

impossible to watch.

this is actually such a smart way to generate a random but smooth-ish curve!

love this!! :)

An absolute triumph! 🌟🎥 This video is a triumph of content creation, seamlessly blending knowledge and entertainment. The presentation is flawless, and the visuals are nothing short of spectacular. I was entranced from the first moment and left with a deep appreciation for the subject matter. It's evident that the creators poured their creativity and expertise into this project, and the result is nothing short of exceptional. I'll be singing the praises of this video for a long time. Bravo! 👏🚀2.8k

It seems like your quadtree example doesn't have any improvement over non quadtree approach.

Great video as always. Question: If I want to be able to click on an object and drag that same one object to a new location, how do I achieve this?

Next, make this algorithm in raster (each individual's pixels)🌚

let m=0; function setup() { createCanvas(400, 400); background(0); } function draw() { noStroke(); if(mouseIsPressed) ellipse(mouseX,mouseY,m); } function mousePressed(){ fill(random(255),random(255),random(255),100); m=random(20,50); }

why do you need a seperate function for this? its same as just col=(255/600)*mouseX in the case of ranges starting from random values, u can just add the difference

Fun video! This channel has a lot of these simulation and math type coding problems, but unfortunately using java or JS isn't the right tool or language. Also as others have said, this particular way of calculating PI is best done with a dense scan of the rectangle, not random points. Lastly, we shouldn't need to use the prior knowledge of Pi ti calculate PI. We can compare the calculated PI at the end of the calculation, it just cannot be part of the calculation. Imagine, I can generate random numbers between 0 and 4 and compare them to the real PI, picking the closest one - this is not an actual algorithm to compute PI. So let's do this correctly. Written in C (not C++ which has complex syntax), which not only is significantly faster than Java but has a cleaner syntax and more options to use long double type for more precision. I've ran the code below for a few minutes to calculate PI to the 9th digit: Calculated PI: 3.1415926525707500000482441659954702117830 Real PI : 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971 main() { long long circle = 0; long long r = 2000000; long long r2 = r * r; for (long long y = -r; y < r; y++) { for (long long x = -r; x < r; x++) { if ((x * x + y * y) <= r2) circle++; } } long long total = 4 * r * r; printf("Calculated PI: %.40Lf ", 4.0L * (long double)circle / (long double)total); printf("Real PI : 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971 "); } compiled with: gcc main.c -w -O3 -mavx2 Really simple code, right? And for those who don't like C pointers, just use the array notation. Please, these tutorials would be so much better and faster in C. I've seen a lot of videos on this channel, where the resolution was dropped to get performance to be decent or there was a lot of waiting required to get the computed result - The Mandelbrot based PI (at 0.25, 0 location) was a perfect example where using a native language like C would have made it significantly faster.

I remember using grammars and lexers/parsers in Ocaml last year for college, was great to see it visualized like this!

21:37 ✅ "fd": function() {turtle.forward()} ❌ "fd": turtle.forward

8 years later frameRate() works when you put it in setup but still breaks when I try to use it in draw()

That’s amazing

13:40 Why did bro put a POST increment insead of an PRE increment. That returns the OLD value, not the NEW INCREMENTED one.

The continue keyword is a joke to this man

СУПЕР ТОПОВЫЙ КАНАЛ, жаль что я нашел этот канал только недавно. чууух чууух